Daniel Smith Speaks Out! RADIO SHOWS

GCN Live Dr. Leonard Coldwell 1/11/2015

Genesis Communications Network, Sunday Jan 11, 2015    Dr Leonard Coldwell is outraged by what is happening in this malicious prosecution. He knows MMS works because he used it legally in Europe! Daniel explains the events leading up to the FDA raids and reveals there may be a hidden hand behind the scenes. Did a major pharmaceutical company want to secure the product for themselves? It happened to Burzynski and his valuable discovery of antineoplastons… There have been patents secured and clinical trials approved for the chlorite matrix since the harassment of Daniel Smith began.  Meanwhile, the Department of Justice accuses him of selling industrial bleach!

World Beyond Belief interviews Daniel Smith -Standing Trial for Health Freedom

Saturday January 10, 2015 ~ Daniel Smith exposes the government/corporate control matrix that wants to take away your right to choose alternative health remedies. He faces severe criminal charges for selling a health product readily available from such mainstream sources as E Bay and Amazon.com. The Justice Department and the FDA hope not only to convict Daniel, but also through his case, severely limit your personal freedom to choose your own paths toward health. Please help support Daniel win his case on behalf of health freedom for us all at http://standbydaniel.com The World Beyond Belief is hosted by Paul W Marko, Ph.D., author of Belief Magic, available on Amazon.com and on our blog http://pineconeutopia.yolasite.com, home of UnUniversity where you can find links to many other researchers working diligently to expose the Matrix government.

1/6/15 Patricia Aiken Revolution Radio Sacred Cow

1/5/2015  One Radio Network Patrick Timpone Daniel Smith MMS Trial

After he helped tens of thousands of people all around the world, the FDA raided his organization, seized his assets, handcuffed and forcibly removed both he and his wife from their home in front of their eight-year old daughter, threw them in jail, threatened his family and slandered them in the media – all to demoralize them, taint any future jury, and decrease their chances of winning.

But Daniel has not given up. He can still win – with our support.

12/27/2014 The Remedy Radio Show with Tony Pantallaresco




Help Daniel Defend His Freedom

The Story of Daniel’s Stand for Health Freedom

In late 2007, when Daniel Smith became aware of an inexpensive and natural water purifying substance having a positive impact on Malaria in Africa, he left his career in technology and founded Project GreenLife in hopes to make a difference in the human health experience.

The effectiveness of this water purifier can be seen in the Ugandan pilot project video posted directly below.

Malaria Meets MMS: Ugandan Case Study

Background (2007-2013)

Little did Daniel know that four years after launching Project GreenLife, it would turn his life – and the lives of everyone he loved – upside down. Much of these life-altering and traumatic events are already subject of various articles published by independent news sources like the U.S. Observer, News with Views and Thought For Food.

What has not been well published is that in January of 2013, nearly two years after the armed raids, asset seizures, and a host of constitutional infringements, Daniel and his beloved partner Karis, along with two others, were indicted (and arrested) in the USA on a trumped-up six-count indictment charging violations of near century-old draconian food and drug law – each facing up to 37 years in prison.

Shortly after the charges were filed, Daniel and Karis were arrested by FDA agents who entered their home in Ashland Oregon on an early Monday morning while waking their daughter for school.  Armed agents loomed at the foot of their daughter’s bed while her parents consoled her with their hands cuffed behind their backs.

Young Miss Sabby was forced to leave her home and all her friends at the Waldorf School in Ashland to travel back to Spokane Washington where she would not see her parents again for almost a month – the time the government would take to extradite her parents from Oregon to Washington.

Sabrielle – “Sabby”

A Call for LOVE: The Matter of MMS, the FDA, and Daniel Smith by Adam Abraham

No Warning Letter ever issued from the FDA for any product carried by PGL, including MMS.

However, in 2010, PGL’s attorney, Nancy Lord, M.D., was contacted by the FDA following a surprise “regulatory inspection” in which the agency related their dislike for the product based upon claims by FDA science officers that would later prove by experts to be false.  The FDA “asked” PGL to conduct a “voluntary recall” of all MMS.

As a precautionary measure, and in an effort to avoid retaliation by the agency, PGL effected the “voluntarily recall.”

Shortly after, PGL underwent a reorganization into a private member association.  Prior to the reorganization, Daniel wrote the FDA and asked if they had any legal valid objection to their making their products available to private members under the First Amendment Right of Association clause.  The letter was sent to multiple FDA officials stating clearly that PGL would do so only if the FDA had no objection.  The FDA provided no objection leading PGL to believe they had none.

Rather than be forthcoming, FDA agents began sneaking around Daniel’s home and other properties taking photos, going through trash, and attaching warrantless GPS devices to vehicles.  Daniel would later learn that the FDA was creating a dossier for the purpose of convincing a federal magistrate to issue seizure warrants to allow the FDA to seize all of PGL’s assets.

It would not be until late June of 2011 when armed federal agents came from all over the country to take part in a well-organized raid of three locations: Daniel’s home, a bottling facility, and a fulfillment company.  The FDA also raided Daniel’s and the Association’s bank accounts, effectively putting PGL out of business in a single day.

Surely if the FDA had a valid legal objection or were genuinely concerned about people’s use of MMS, they would have answered PGL’s letter, rather than sit by while PGL made MMS available to its members for another year, all the while secretly planning the raids.

FDA’s Goal: Make an Example of Daniel and Teach the Health Freedom Movement that Nobody Stands Up to the FDA

What Exactly is “MMS” or Acidified Sodium Chlorite?

MMS (Miracle [Master] Mineral Solution) is a simple solution of sodium chlorite dissolved in distilled water.

Sodium chlorite is perfectly legal to buy, sell, import, export, and possess.  It is still available to this day on Ebay, Amazon, and from scores of online distributors worldwide.  It has been marketed throughout the world for nearly a century, most notably for use in water purification.

When mixed with weak acids, such as citric acid, sodium chlorite is a precursor to a dynamic array of redox molecules effective in the eradication of yeasts, molds, fungi, viruses, and bacteria, all which thrive in aqueous solutions (including human body water) and are a leading cause of various disease symptoms throughout the world.

Sodium chlorite, properly acidified, contains no residual sodium chlorite, as this is all spent in the reaction. Hence, alleged “dangers” of sodium chlorite is a misnomer.  The resultant chemistry, if and when ingested, breaks down internally to oxygen, sodium, and chloride – all essential nutrients for the sustenance of human life.

The Politics of “Your” Health

The archaic laws and overbroad policies of the FDA, which unquestionably favor large corporations, allow the agency to arbitrarily define what would otherwise constitute natural and ubiquitous substances as “drugs” whenever the agency declares their “intended use” to “mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent disease.”

In that sense, the FDA has become an agency that maintains and enforces what is, effectively, a monopoly over human health.

The absurdity of this proposition should be almost immediately obvious and, for those interested, a more in-depth analysis of the politics driving the machinery is provided at the bottom of this page.

The War on Health: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny (Trailer)

Your Health Freedom vs. Their Special Interest

It was no surprise then when, in June of 2013 (after the arrests), sodium chlorite suddenly received “orphaned drug status” in the EU for the treatment of ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease).  See Sodium Chlorite (NP001) Receives Orphaned “Drug” Status in the European Union.

It was also no surprise to find that clinical studies were already under way for the use of sodium chlorite (designated “NP001”) in the treatment of Alzheimer’s, Multiple Sclerosis, and Parkinson’s.

Neither was it a surprise to find numerous patents – many based on clinical studies – for the use of acidified sodium chlorite in the safe and effective treatment of HIV, dermatologic and inflammatory diseases, infectious diseasescancers, and diabetic ulcers, to name a few.  See also, Immunokine designated “WF10“.

More recently, the U.S. military has turned to sodium chlorite to generate chlorine dioxide (ClO2) to fight the spread of dread Ebola.

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center Using ClO2 to Combat Ebola
“Our ClO2 technology is being used in West Africa by various world health organizations, including the U.S. government, to sterilize items contaminated with the Ebola virus.”  Source:  www.chlordisys.com.

On December 17, 2014, Genesis II reported the defeat of Ebola in Sierra Leone West Africa using MMS.

These late revelations merely confirm what Daniel Smith and others have known for some time, having themselves heard and been witness to thousands of testimonials and stories from all over the world.

While the FDA has had full knowledge of scientific studies and clinical data supporting the safe and effective use of acidified sodium chlorite for an increasing number of human health concerns, the agency along with the Department of Justice have together pretended that no such data exists – all the while referring to Daniel and his friends in the media as snake-oil salesmen in a coverup effort to demonize the personal use of acidified sodium chlorite.

This of course begs the question, just who are these agencies really working for?

MMS – 101 Household Uses

Sodium chlorite solution (MMS) has an untold number of household uses, not the least of which is to purify untreated well water or chlorinated city drinking water from carcinogenic THMs.

Chances are, you’ve already ingested acidified sodium chlorite if you’ve ever traveled to – or are lucky enough to live in – a city that already uses chlorine dioxide rather than chlorine to purify its water.   Is the FDA going after water municipalities?

Acidified MMS can be used in almost every room of a home… in the kitchen, to clean hard surfaces, meat, or store-bought vegetables; in the laundry, to eradicate odors; in the bedroom, to get rid of bed bugs; the bathroom, to kill shower mold and other germs; the basement, to get rid of mildew; and air ducts to neutralize mold spores.

The number of external uses for MMS acidified sodium chlorite far exceed the internal ones, but its the internal ones that pose the biggest threat to the pharmaceutical industry and are thus problematic for the FDA.

2010 propaganda photo taken by the FDA of MMS against a red backdrop to scare consumers away from personally acidifying their own sodium chlorite:
It doesn’t take long to see how Daniel and Project GreenLife, making a year’s worth of sodium chlorite solution available for pennies a day (as little as $10 a bottle) that consumers, in turn, could acidify for any one of a plethora of personal reasons, would awaken this less than sleeping giant.

“Daniel” vs. Goliath

Shortly after his arrest, Daniel Smith read a message etched into the cinder block walls of his jail cell, a message left by a former prisoner that read these simple words: “REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE.

Daniel pondered what it meant to remember who he was – starting with his given name, Louis Daniel.  Louis, he knew meant “Famous Warrior” and Daniel, “God is my judge.”  With that, Daniel knew he had to fight.

Because Daniel lacked adequate funds to hire a team of lawyers experienced in FDCA law – something the government made sure of by first seizing all his assets – the moment Daniel was released from jail, he entered his appearance in the case “pro se” – representing himself as his own attorney.

Over the course of two years (2013 – 2014), Daniel researched and filed upwards of 100 pleadings in the form of motions, responses, and replies, attacking jurisdiction, prosecutorial misconduct, discovery and constitutional violations, and various procedural errors.  These filings are all available on the public record.

Not surprising, the government-paid defense attorneys (for co-defendants) filed little to nothing, seemingly waiting for a palatable plea offer to avoid having to try a complex case.  It has since been learned that upwards of 97% of all cases never go to trial for this very reason.

THREE FELONIES A DAY – How the Feds Target the Innocent, by Harvey A. Silverglate
In his foreword of Silverglate’s “Three Felonies a Day“, Harvard Law professor, Alan M. Dershowitz writes:

“Harvey Silverglate, an experienced and astute criminal lawyer, makes a compelling case that federal prosecutors are abusing their power by using the criminal law to prosecute law abiding citizens whose conduct is arguably covered by extremely vague criminal statutes that are capable of reaching acts which are believed to be lawful by those who commit them.

“These prosecutors threatened to indict underlings for conduct that is even further away from the core of criminality unless they cooperate against the real targets.  Because federal criminal law carries outrageously high sentences – often with mandatory minimums – these prosecutorial threats are anything but illusory.  They turn friends into enemies, family members into government witnesses and employees into stool pigeons.

“Silverglate believes that we are in danger of becoming a society in which prosecutors alone become judges, juries and executioners because the threat of high sentences makes it too costly for even innocent people to resist the prosecutorial pressure. That is why nearly all criminal defendants today plead guilty to “reduced” charges rather than risk a trial with draconian sentences in the event of a conviction.”

Licensed to Lie – Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice by Sidney Powell

“WHEN THE GUARDIANS OF JUSTICE BECOME THE PERPETRATORS OF INJUSTICE – Licensed to Lie is the story of the strong-arm, illegal, and unethical tactics used by headline-grabbing federal prosecutors in their narcissistic pursuit of power.”

Author, Sidney Powell, served in the Department of Justice for ten years in Texas and Virginia and has devoted her private practice to federal appeals for the past twenty years.  In Licensed to Lie, Powell leads readers through the disturbing missteps, cover-ups, malfeasance, and corruption of justice that have caused her to question the system she has been committed to for over thirty years.

“This book should serve as the beginning of a serious conversation about whether our criminal justice system continues to live up to its vaunted reputation.  As citizens of a free society, we all have an important stake in making sure that it does.” – From the Foreword by Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in his personal capacity.

Some Motions Filed By Daniel Smith
Over the last two years, Daniel has argued several of his motions before the judge.  Each time, under the guidance of those more experienced, Daniel’s level of confidence and presentation improved.  Seasoned attorneys commented that Daniel argued better than 90% of all other attorneys they’d seen.  Others agreed, Daniel had outargued the prosecution hands down. Nevertheless, the judge’s rulings always ended in one word: “DENIED“.

Where the prosecution faltered, the judge covered for the government.  Where the prosecution failed to argue, the judge argued for the government.  Where the prosecution filed false pleadings, the judge swept them under the rug.  When Daniel’s argument could not be easily overcome, it was omitted or liberally misconstrued to clear the way for a ruling in favor of the government.

This is the current state of our federal district courts in America.  The doctrine of Separation of Powers is an ideal that lost its way when the courts became embroiled in securitizing – and thus monetizing – the cases that it hears.

In summary, every attempt made by Daniel to obtain a just ruling was met with a clear and unmistakable demonstration of judicial bias.

Following one such denial, Karis wrote the following tender note to Daniel:

“I’m sorry the judge is so adversarial to you, specifically.  It’s not fair …  and I believe in my heart that you have the ability to see through it to a solution that really changes things for everyone.”

“You have become a warrior through all of this, and that is admirable, but remember that David had smooth stones and a soft heart.  Remember that your greatest gift in this world is your sweet heart.”

“I know this can’t be any help or comfort right now, but I suppose I’m just committed to reminding you of this over and over.  Who you are is not an angry, defiant, warring victim to the government.

“You are creative, visionary, generous, tender and loving.  Those are your five smooth stones.”  ~ Karis

Five Smooth Stones

Daniel’s Case Severed on Spurious Grounds : Co-Defendants “Plead Out”

On November 7, 2014, with trial less than 30 days out, after learning Daniel’s co-defendants had refused the government’s “plea offers”, the judge severed the case into two separate trials – one for Daniel and one for the remaining co-defendants – setting Daniel’s trial off by three months.  This effectively forced Daniel’s co-defendants into either pleading guilty to lesser charges, or risk going to trial in less than 30 days without Daniel – the only one preparing for trial.

The judge justified the ruling by falsely branding Daniel a “sovereign citizen” (the top domestic terrorist threat in America according to the Department of Homeland Security), asserting that Daniel’s co-defendants would be “prejudiced” if they had to go to trial with him.

Watching their attorneys do little-to-nothing for almost two years and the judge deny every one of Daniel’s motions in favor of the government, Daniel’s co-defendants were effectively forced into pleading guilty to lesser charges in order to avoid having to go to trial virtually alone, where the stakes were high and there were no guarantees of a fair trial.  They were told by their attorneys their pleas would likely mean no jail time.

As Harvard Law professor, Alan M. Dershowitz, pointed out, defendants in similar situations eventually “plead” not because they believe they have done anything wrong, but because the government effectively extorts from them a “lesser” conviction by threatening a heavy prison sentence and never seeing their families again.

As the prosecutor (Christopher E. Parisi) admitted to an attorney for one of Daniel’s co-defendants at the beginning of the case, “We know [your client] is not as culpable; it’s really Mr. Smith we’re after.”  This was in spite of charging her with 37 years as well.

Daniel’s Trial Currently Set for March 3, 2015

Daniel’s trial is now set for March, 3, 2015 – less than 90 days away.  The government has access to unlimited resources.  Daniel requires financial assistance to consult with highly experienced counsel and to pay for other legal expenses, including expert witnesses and transportation of witnesses from various locations around the world.

Experts say that Daniel’s case is winnable for several reasons that cannot be discussed in open forum.   Dr. Mary J. Ruwart wrote something about Daniel’s legal challenges in a 2010 article entitled, The FDA Wants Jurisdiction Over Your Kitchen!

Voir Dire – Questions the Government Intends to Ask Prospective Jurors

When selecting a jury, both parties are given an opportunity to ask questions to help identify and eliminate jurors that may exhibit a bias.

The prosecution has submitted a set of revealing questions it intends to ask the jury lending insight into the heart of this prosecution.

“1.  Do you believe the FDA protects the public health by making sure drugs are safe and effective for their intended uses?”  

If you answered NO to this question, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that statistics show 290 people are killed every day by FDA-approved prescription drugs.  Other statistics show that someone dies from FDA-approved drugs every 14 minutes.

“2.  Who here believes that a person who wants to sell a new drug to people as a cure for diseases should get FDA approval first by showing that it is safe and effective?”  

If you answered NO to this question, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  See what the UK thinks about FDA approved drugs vs. non-FDA approved supplements here; and how more than 60,000 people died from taking Vioxx alone – a drug the FDA found to be both “safe and effective”.

“3.  Do you believe that consenting adults should be allowed to buy and sell alternative medicines without interference from the FDA?”  

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury – or people like these men and women testifying before Congress.

“4.  Who thinks that the government cannot be trusted to protect the public health?”

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that even the prestigious Harvard University Center for Ethics has found the FDA cannot be trusted.

“5. Do any of you believe that the FDA cares more about drug company profits than the public health?”

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that even the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (2013, Vol. 14, No. 3: 590-610) published that since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs and that the authorization of user fees in 1992 “turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency.”  See Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs.  The prestigious journal further writes, “unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate.”

“6.  Do any of you think that the FDA has blocked public access to effective medicines for improper reasons?”  

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.   This is in spite of evidence that the FDA does in fact block effective medicines.

“7.  Who agrees with the following statement: regular vaccinations protect the public against the spread of illnesses and diseases like chicken pox or measles?”

If you did not agree with this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the tremendous weight of evidence that vaccination is a fundamentally flawed science and causes more harm in our society than good.

“8.  Who here believes that children should not be required to get vaccinated in order to attend public school?”

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  Perhaps the most telling of all the questions, the prosecution here obviously believes that one’s right to not have themselves or their children injected with a neurotoxic cocktail containing heavy metals and foreign disease matter has no place in our society.

“9.  Does anyone here think that the government should not put fluoride in our drinking water?”

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.   This is in spite of copious evidence that fluoride is a poison that decreases the IQ of adults and children.

“10.  Would any of you have difficulty finding someone guilty if she committed a crime because she believed she was helping people?”  

If you answered yes to this, the prosecutor definitely would not want you on the jury.

In other words – if you are an informed, thinking, compassionate human being, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury!

What if Daniel Loses?

If Daniel loses this case, he could spend up to 37 years in federal prison.  In turn, the FDA will use its victory as a precedent to launch a campaign against resellers of sodium chlorite solution worldwide.  PGL was selectively targeted by the FDA to set an example.

MMS and sodium chlorite are still available today on Ebay, Amazon, and from scores of distributors throughout the the world; but not for long if the FDA gets their conviction.

Daniel is standing not only for his family but for all of us in the health freedom movement.  With the right legal team, the right experts, and a well-prepared defense, we can all win.  Without these, we all lose and Daniel goes to jail.  Any one of us could be next.

This is your opportunity to make a difference.

As the 1992 Libertarian Party Vice-Presidential Candidate, Attorney Nancy Lord, M.D., said on June 6, 1994 in closing argument in the famous case of FDA v. Roger Sless:

“Tell the FDA that you want them to leave Dr. Priestley and all of her colleagues in the supplement industry alone.  Tell the FDA to go back to Rockville, Maryland. Tell them to take their guns and their badges with them. Tell them that the only thing in this trial that isn’t safe and effective is the FDA.  Remember what Dr. Priestley said.  Those guns are loaded.  Somebody could get hurt…”

Source: Gift of Speech

A Letter from Daniel to Supporters

“Dear friends, words cannot express our family’s gratitude for all your prayers and support in the last seven years – particularly in the last three.

In 2012, many of you gave to a fund collected by Genesis II and/or the U.S. Observer, and many of you have continued to send support personally since.  Thank you.

Thousands of you, from all over the world, sent sworn declarations, some directly to the grand jury foreman, care of the prosecutor who, as it turns out, deliberately withheld them from the jury – though the government admits receiving them in a recent filing.  Nonetheless, thank you.

While the government’s allegations have tested our strength and resolve, it has been your continued and often unsolicited support that has reminded us we are not alone.

I realize I have been off-radar for a considerable amount of time. This has, in part, been due to sheer exhaustion.  When the government has marshaled considerable resources against you, it can be hard to get out of bed some mornings.

Its also been difficult because the prosecutor dragged my friends and family into harms way so I have felt compelled to keep a low profile so the government did not retaliate against them.

I am reminded as I type this email, I am wearing a government issued monitoring device, which has been married to my ankle for the last two years (a form of house arrest – a condition of my pre-trial release).

I’m attaching a photo of this clever device, which assures the government I am safe and sound in my home every night between 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.  In the beginning, it insured that I never left home at all – not even to the grocery.   Other than keeping me from going swimming with the kids, I hardly notice its there anymore.  This device communicates with an alien-looking GPS-device that sits on top of our piano.

A lot has changed in the MMS universe since 2011, but the challenges we face in the health freedom movement are not limited to MMS.

There are some who would say that, since its inception, the FDA has abused legal process to limit the availability of all manner of safe, effective, and affordable alternatives to allopathic medicine.  Never has the “business of cancer”, for example, been so well documented as in the case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.

Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business (Trailer)

Attorney Nancy Lord, M.D. once argued in her closing of the famous Roger Sless trial:

[Start quote.] “The idea of government control of medicine occurred to two people — Benjamin Rush, George Washington’s personal doctor and a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Jefferson.

“Benjamin Rush warned: ‘Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship… To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science.  All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a republic… The Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.’

“The Founders guaranteed that we would remain free of government interference in our choice of religion.  When the founders wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they knew that government would try to dictate religion, because it always had.

“But in spite of Dr. Rush’s prophetic warning, the right to freedom in our choice of health care is not part of the Bill of Rights.  The founders never imagined that a trial such as this would ever take place in America.  Because they never thought the federal government would even attempt to control what we keep in our medicine cabinets and kitchen cabinets.  There was no such thing as the FDA until 1906, when the Pure Food and Drugs Act permitted the government to seize dangerous substances.  Then in 1938 they required that safety data be submitted for evaluation.  In 1962, all of those products and any new ones had to submit data on effectiveness and wait until the FDA approved the drug before it could be marketed.”  [End quote.]

Friends, 2015 will be a decisive year for all of us. Ultimately, our success depends upon our ability to gain support in this eleventh hour.  We have reached the end of our own resources, but have so much more to accomplish in the next 90 days.  Although we are on the homestretch, we still need substantial funding to see this through.

Many of you have helped us before, and this has made it possible for us to fight the battle up to now.  If you’ve ever thought of contributing more to help preserve our right to health freedom, now is the time.

The results of this campaign will determine not only my own family’s future but the future of MMS, and help establish an important trajectory in the health freedom movement.  Please stand with us in solidarity at this critical time.

I hope to write more of the journey soon, and to give those who remain interested, a glimpse into the countless miracles that have sustained us – no doubt, because of all your prayers and support.

Thank you for everything.

Daniel Smith
c/o: 1314 S. Grand Blvd. Ste 2-128
Spokane, Washington 99202
+001 (509) 590-2188
Skype: shuzammy

A Prayer Warrior’s Vision

More About Daniel and Karis

Daniel and Karis founded Project GreenLife in 2007, a vision that began in 2004 when Daniel’s biological mother suddenly passed after being poorly diagnosed – left to starve on a hospital bed in the advance stages of cancer.

When Daniel inquired regarding the hospital’s inattentiveness to his mother’s nutritional requirements, her doctor replied, “I eat Twinkies and drink Coca-Cola. I’m a medical doctor.  I know nothing about nutrition.” Daniel would later learn that many practicing MD’s never receive more than an hour of nutritional education during medical training.  This launched Daniel on a course that eventually led to Project GreenLife.

Daniel and Karis have four children, two girls, two boys (ages 10-22), and one grandson.  Karis is a natural healer, versed in various modalities including Massage, Directed Breath and Matrix Energetics.  Daniel and Karis home-schooled all three of their children for their early years.

Daniel’s first love has always been music.  You can hear him perform one of his songs here:  Peace Be Still

Today I Woke Up – Daniel Smith-Votino

Politics of Sodium Chlorite (continued from above)

The archaic laws and overbroad policies of the FDA allow it to arbitrarily declare less novel (and thus less patentable) substances “drugs” whenever the agency decides the “intended use” of the substance is to “mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent disease”.

The absurdity of this proposition should be almost immediately obvious, for this suggests the agency may convert, for example, a standard household toilet into a “medical device”, for the purposes of regulating, or Vitamin C for the treatment of scurvy into a “drug”, water for the treatment of dehydration the same and, invariably, water purification drops such as MMS into a “drug”, because these all “prevent disease” in one way or another.

In turn, the law declares that any interstate transfer of such a device or substance (or any component thereof) absent a near half billion dollar right-of-passage fee to the agency (i.e., a “drug application fee”) to be an “infamous crime” – that is, if the agency should find a technical error in the labeling such to declare the article “misbranded”.

Not surprisingly, it was the pharmaceutical companies that first lobbied Congress for such high barriers to entry – the purpose of which to keep “the little guy” from entering the market with products that could take billions from publicly traded companies.  This is the lifeblood of the FDA and the trillion dollar sickness industry that props a failing world economy.

In short, it is the “public policy” of the FDA to protect “public health”, which really means protecting publicly traded companies from potential losses.  In this sense, the FDA is fulfilling its prime directive perfectly when it suppresses affordable alternatives, but it does so at the expense of your personal health and freedom.

Please give today.   With your help, we can achieve a successful outcome in this struggle we all share against this modern day Goliath.

Please share this GoFundMe campaign on Twitter and Facebook.

PLEASE SHARE:      http://www.gofundme.com/mmsdefensefund     www.standbydaniel.com

MMS Cures Malaria in Uganda

Malaria is one of the worst diseases in the world and there are over 200 million cases each year. It is the leading cause of death for African children under 5.  Big names like Bill Gates and George Soros donate millions of dollars to fight malaria.

When Jim Humble accidentally discovered years ago that the water purification drops he brought along on his gold prospecting trip to Guyana cured his helpers of malaria, he knew how important that was and he has dedicated himself since then to getting that knowledge out to Africa and the rest of the world. At one point, he had set himself the goal of making one country in Africa malaria free. Although that goal has not been accomplished, there is reason to believe that it could happen, and very quickly.

Who is Klaas Proesmans?

Belgian Klaas Proesmans, CEO of the Water Reference Center (WRC), which has an affiliation with the Red Cross, attended an MMS training seminar in Mexico in 2012. He was interested enough to then organize a field clinic in Uganda with the Red Cross. The results were astonishing: all 154 people who were malaria positive were found free of the malaria parasite within 48 hours after treatment with MMS. He made a video showing the entire process and, in the video, expressed his excitement with the remarkable results. You can watch his video here, embedded within this video to which  Jim Humble added an introduction and Jim’s associate Leo Koehof added an epilogue.

We can only assume that Proesmans was sincere in seeking a cure for malaria. His finding indicates that merely disinfecting the internal waters of the human body is sufficient to eliminate the malaria parasite. MMS is not a drug and was not used as such according to the words of Proesmans: “The aim of the mission is to look at the side effects that a certain way of purifying water has on the blood of certain patients.” Every reference he makes to the test refers to drinking the water containing the water purifier, MMS. He states, “In total we identified 154 malaria positive patients, together with the local health {authorities} or the doctors. All of them were treated. All of them were, between 24 hours and 48 hours, malaria negative… without any side effects!” (Transcript of Proesmans’ words)

So why then did Proesmans try to deny his association with the test, the results, and even the video in which he himself appears as the organizer? Why did the International Federation of the Red Cross disassociate themselves from the amazing results? Until the Proesman video was accidentally uncovered on YouTube, the Red Cross went so far as to declare that the test never happened!

How did this man transform from seeking the truth to actively participating in a cover up? What is the financial relationship between his company and the Red Cross? Why would the Red Cross not want to promote an inexpensive non toxic water purification product that could potentially eradicate the worst disease in the world?

No doubt this experience has been a painful wake up call for Proesmans. No doubt financial interests lie behind his repudiation of this remarkable experiment, and he knows he has compromised his integrity. My question to him:

Will the real Klaas Proesmans please stand up?

Some Facts of the Case

Click here to read in Spanish

I was reviewing the available information about MMS, Daniel Smith and the upcoming federal trial in Spokane WA and it seemed outdated and insufficient to learn about the overall importance of the trial. Available information seems oriented toward those who already know something about the case. My efforts here will be to gather information about this trial and the controversial chemical called MMS that can help us understand what is going on.

Daniel ran a business (Project Green Life, 2007-2011) selling health supplements as well as MMS, a product that has long been available under different names to purify drinking water. His business was raided twice by the FDA and after the first raid in August 2010, he changed his business structure to a private health membership association and advised the FDA of this change. After the second raid (June 29, 2011) he was unable to continue in business because his accounts and cash on hand were seized as well as his computers and merchandise. There were two Grand Juries convened to look into the case and neither returned an indictment, but the investigations continued and in Feb 2013 charges were filed by the U.S. Dept of Justice against four people: Daniel Smith, his partner Karis Delong, his former customer service rep Tammy Olson, and her husband Chris.

Daniel and Karis were arrested on Feb 4, 2013 and imprisoned for a month as they were considered a flight risk due to their international travel. Daniel, Karis and Tammy are each charged with conspiracy, four counts of interstate sales of misbranded drugs and one count of smuggling. The most serious charge is smuggling, which carries a sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison upon conviction. According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Parisi, the defendants face a maximum sentence of 37 years in prison if convicted on all the charges, but they would likely be sentenced from 63 months to 78 months under federal sentencing guidelines. This case is being prosecuted by the DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch. However the indictment does not make any claims that MMS sickened or harmed anyone. The prosecution has also stated that Daniel, Karis and Tammy are not charged with defrauding customers, only the FDA.

Four years have passed since the first FDA raid and Daniel and his family have seen their lives turned upside down with all the government harassment.

Daniel has been filing motions and challenging the process every step of the way, learning so much that he is now acting as his own lawyer. Why would a family man with so much to lose take on this battle? Because he is an idealist and a humanitarian, one of the few who will stand up and speak the truth in the face of widespread opposition. Daniel and his co-defendants in this situation have all been offered plea deals and they have refused, because they have not done anything wrong. On the contrary, like most people, they believe that we are guaranteed freedoms in our constitution and that within the structure of the business they had legally formed, they were acting within the law. And the email testimonials that they received were indications that the ‘off label’ use of this water purifier was producing major health benefits for many purchasers.


“If I went to prison, I would go with a clean conscience, knowing that other people’s lives were saved. That’s got to be worth something.” ~ Daniel Smith

Why would this trial be important to the citizens of the United States?

It is a multi-faceted issue because there are the legal issues about whether MMS is a ‘drug’ that is not approved by the FDA. MMS in its pure form, as sold, does not have any of the chlorine dioxide that is supposedly ‘the drug’. It must be activated with an acid to produce that disinfecting chemical. That happens in the privacy of the consumer’s home. There are accusations of international smuggling from Canada when the product freely crosses the border every day, literally in industrial quantities. There is the use of forfeiture, the tool being used to strip defendants of their assets, thereby leaving them unable to cover the expense of a trial.

Then there is the question many ask themselves, does MMS work? Does it cause harm? What about the issue of personal freedom? Do we have the right to ingest substances that we believe may be health enhancing based on our personal research and decision? If a decision by popular referendum can change the legal status of marijuana, thus bypassing the (costly) drug approval process, is it time to start reconsidering the status of other medically useful substances that citizens would like the right to consume?

And of course, who is the defendant and what is the sought-after sentence? Is it proportional when there is no injured party and the purchasers of the product were members of a private health membership association? Is our government maliciously attacking Daniel Smith et al to make an example of them because he was the most popular and visible seller of a product that could challenge the pharmaceutical monopoly? In an article written in the Spanish health magazine Discovery D Salud in September 2010, it was stated that MMS could potentially replace over 4000 pharmaceuticals!

That one fact may explain this ongoing campaign against MMS.

The trial begins on December 1, 2014 at the
Thomas S. Foley United States Courthouse
920 West Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Daniel, Karis, Tammy and Chris would like as many supporters as possible to be there, the jury needs to see that WE CARE.

Donations to the Smith family via PayPal or postal service:


Daniel Smith
1314 S Grand Blvd. Ste 2-128
Spokane, Washington 99202


Algunos Hechos del Caso

Yo estaba repasando la información disponible sobre MMS, Daniel Smith y el próximo juicio federal en Spokane WA y parecía desactualizada e insuficiente para aprender acerca de la importancia global del juicio. La información disponible parece orientada hacia los que ya saben algo sobre el caso. Mis esfuerzos aquí serán para recopilar información acerca de este juicio y la polémica sustancia química conocida como MMS que puede ayudar a entender lo que está pasando.

Daniel llevaba un negocio (Project Green Life, 2007-2011) dedicado a la venta de suplementos nutricionales para la salud, así como MMS, un producto que desde hace mucho tiempo está disponible bajo diferentes nombres para purificar el agua potable. Su negocio fue allanado dos veces por la FDA y después de la primera incursión en agosto de 2010, cambió su estructura de negocio para formar una asociación de salud de membresía privada y informó a la FDA de este cambio. Después de la segunda incursión (29 de junio de 2011) no pudo seguir con el negocio porque sus cuentas y dinero en efectivo se incautaron, así como sus computadoras y mercancías. Convocaron dos grandes jurados para investigar el caso y ninguno resultó en un escrito de acusación, pero las investigaciones continuaron y en febrero 2013 se presentaron cargos del Departamento de Justicia en contra de cuatro personas: Daniel Smith, su compañera Karis Delong, la que era su representante de servicio al cliente Tammy Olson, y su esposo Chris.

Daniel y Karis fueron arrestados el 4 feb, 2013 y encarcelados por un mes, ya que eran considerados un riesgo de huida debido a sus viajes internacionales. Daniel, Karis y Tammy son acusados de conspiración, cuatro cargos de ventas interestatales de medicamentos mal etiquetados y un cargo de contrabando. El cargo más grave es el contrabando, que conlleva una pena de hasta 20 años en una prisión federal en caso de condena. De acuerdo con el fiscal federal adjunto Christopher Parisi, los acusados enfrentan una sentencia máxima de 37 años de prisión si son declarados culpables de todos los cargos, pero probablemente serían condenados desde 63 meses a 78 meses bajo las Directrices Federales sobre dictado de sentencias. Este caso está siendo procesado por la Sección de Protección al Consumidor del Departamento de Justicia. Sin embargo, la acusación no contiene alegaciones que MMS haya enfermado ni hecho daño a nadie. La fiscalía también ha declarado que Daniel, Karis y Tammy no están acusados de defraudar a los clientes, sólo a la FDA.

Cuatro años han pasado desde la primera incursión de la FDA y Daniel y su familia han experimentado un vuelco total a sus vidas con todo el acoso del gobierno.

Daniel está presentando mociones y desafiando el proceso en todo momento, aprendiendo tanto que ahora está actuando como su propio abogado. ¿Por qué un hombre de familia con tanto que perder se metería en esta batalla? Porque él es un idealista y un humanitario, uno de los pocos que va a ponerse de pie y decir la verdad ante la oposición generalizada. Daniel y sus coacusados en esta situación han sido ofrecido tratos negociados y se han negado, porque no han hecho nada malo. Por el contrario, como la mayoría de la gente, ellos creen que estamos garantizados las libertades en nuestra Constitución y que dentro de la estructura de la empresa que habían formado legalmente, que estaban actuando dentro de la ley. Y los testimonios de correo electrónico que recibieron eran indicios de que el uso “off label” (fuera de lo indicado)de este purificador de agua estaba produciendo importantes beneficios de salud para muchos compradores.

"Si yo fuera a la cárcel, me iría con la conciencia limpia, sabiendo que las vidas de otras personas se salvaron. Eso tiene que valer algo." ~ Daniel Smith

“Si yo fuera a la cárcel, me iría con la conciencia limpia, sabiendo que las vidas de otras personas se salvaron. Eso tiene que valer algo.” ~ Daniel Smith

¿Por qué este juicio tiene importancia para los ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos?

Es un problema multifacético, porque hay las cuestiones legales sobre si MMS es un ‘fármaco’ que no está aprobado por la FDA. MMS en su forma pura, tal y como se vende, no contiene nada del dióxido de cloro que es supuestamente ‘el fármaco’. Se debe activar con un ácido para producir esa sustancia química de desinfección. Eso sucede en la privacidad de la casa del consumidor. Hay acusaciones de contrabando internacional desde Canadá cuando el producto atraviesa libremente la frontera todos los días en cantidades industriales, literalmente. Tambien hay el uso de la confiscación, la herramienta que se utiliza para despojar a los acusados de sus bienes, asi dejandolos incapazes de poder cubrir los gastos de un juicio.

Luego hay el asunto que muchos se preguntan, ¿Funciona el MMS? ¿Causa daño? ¿Qué pasa con el tema de la libertad personal? ¿Tenemos el derecho de ingerir sustancias que creemos que puedan mejorar nuestra salud basandonos en nuestra investigación y decisión personales? Si una decisión por referéndum popular puede cambiar el estatus legal de la marihuana, evitando así el (costoso) proceso de aprobación de medicamentos, ¿Es hora ya de empezar a reconsiderar la situación de otras sustancias médicamente útiles que a los ciudadanos les gustaría tener el derecho de consumir?

Y, por supuesto, ¿Quién es el acusado y cuál es la sentencia buscada? ¿Es proporcional cuando no hay parte perjudicada y los compradores del producto eran miembros de una asociación de salud de membresía privada? ¿Está nuestro gobierno atacando maliciosamente a Daniel Smith y compañía para servir de escarmiento, porque él era el vendedor más popular y visible de un producto que podría desafiar el monopolio farmacéutico? En un artículo escrito en la revista de salud español de Discovery D Salud en septiembre de 2010, se afirmó que el MMS podría potencialmente reemplazar más de 4.000 farmacéuticos!

Ese único hecho puede explicar esta continua campaña contra MMS.

El juicio comienza el 1 de diciembre de 2014 en el

Thomas S. Foley United States Courthouse
920 West Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

A Daniel, Karis, Tammy y Chris les gustaria que tantos seguidores como sea posible estén allí, el jurado tiene que ver que LES QUEREMOS.

Las donaciones para la familia Smith podrán hacerlas a través de PayPal o servicio postal:


Daniel Smith
1314 S Grand Blvd. Ste 2-128
Spokane, Washington 99202